MANAGEMENT VISIONS

Tuesday, February 26, 2008

March 3, 2008

CRAFTSMANSHIP IN BUSINESS SYSTEMS ANALYSIS

Recently I wrote a paper on the general state of craftsmanship which was geared more for public consumption as opposed to any specific industry. To my way of thinking, craftsmanship is a universal concept that touches all industries, regardless if they are product or service related. This resulted in a flurry of e-mails to me questioning how it pertains to specific types of work, including Business Systems Analysis (BSA) which, of course, is applicable but I question whether we have truly realized craftsmanship in this field.

From the outset, let me say unequivocally that BSA is not a new concept and has been with us for a long time, actually predating the modern computer era of the 20th century. Prior to this, companies had formal "Systems & Procedures" departments with analysts focusing on streamlining business processes and primarily using paper and manual procedures. As tabulating and other office equipment emerged, they were responsible for their integration into the business. But as computers were introduced, a new function was devised that greatly impacted the future of analysts, namely programmers. Slowly but surely analysts were replaced by programmers. By the end of the Structured Programming/CASE mania of the 1980's and 90's, BSA was phased out almost to the point of extinction. In other words, companies were more concerned with programming as opposed to grappling with enterprise-wide systems. Consequently, systems were attacked in piecemeal, usually one program at a time, which resulted in fragmented and disjointed systems, erroneous information, and redundancy in terms of data resources and work effort. Slowly, companies began to realize that a higher level person was needed who understood the business and could engineer integrated systems to serve it. Hence, the rebirth of the Business Systems Analyst as we understand it today.

Several of today's BSA's came up through the ranks of programming and are actually programmers in sheep's clothing, and tend to see things only from a computing point of view. However, there are many others whose roots can be traced to today's business schools. I view a true Business Systems Analyst as the intermediary between the end-users and the programming staff. This means they have the ability to understand both business and technical concepts and communicate them effectively with both the end-users and the programmers. In other words, one of the key roles the analyst plays is that of translator.

THE ROLE OF CRAFTSMANSHIP

In my article, I defined craftsmanship as...

"The practice and pursuit of excellence in building/delivering superior work products by workers."

By this definition, craftsmanship and quality are not synonymous. Whereas quality is primarily concerned with zero defects, craftsmanship implies a human trait in "pursuit of excellence." To better describe the concept, I came up with the following formula:

"Craftsmanship = (Knowledge + Experience + Attitude) X Success"

This itemizes the variables associated with craftsmanship. Before we discuss "Knowledge," let's consider the others first. "Experience" means the worker has been able to apply the knowledge he/she has learned, not just once, but repetitively. "Attitude" addresses the person's sense of professionalism and dedication to his/her craft, that they possess an intellectual curiosity and continually strives for improvement. And "Success" means the worker has demonstrated he/she can produce products to the satisfaction of both the client and the company he/she works for, not just once but routinely. Regardless of the person's knowledge, experience and attitude, if the worker cannot successfully deliver the work product, it is for naught.

To me, the "knowledge" variable is the Achilles' heel to craftsmanship in Business Systems Analysis. As mentioned earlier, BSA is not a new concept, but was almost made extinct. Fortunately, it is beginning to rebound and, as part of its resurrection, the industry is reinventing systems theory with programming muddying the waters. For example, how BSA is taught at the college level is certainly not uniform. Sometimes it is taught in the business schools and others in the computer science schools. Further, how one professor may teach it will not be the same as the next. I have seen this not just in this country but overseas as well. In other words, BSA is not yet a teachable science. To qualify as a science, there needs to be a governing body of knowledge consisting of proven and accepted concepts and principles. This includes a standardization of terms in order to avoid a "Tower of Babel" effect. Unfortunately, uniform standards are few and far between in the BSA field. To illustrate, there are numerous interpretations of what a system is, or what information is, or even data.

There are two parts to the "knowledge" variable: initial education/training, and continuous improvement. In terms of initial education/training, you can either learn BSA through the "School of Hard Knocks" or from an accredited institution. I will not digress into the specifics of what a BSA curriculum should include other than to highlight general areas:

* History of BSA.
* General business courses, including such things as general management, organizational analysis, work simplification, industrial engineering, industrial psychology, corporate law, statistics, etc.
* Communications courses; e.g., speech, persuasion, negotiation, corporate and technical writing, interviewing, etc.
* Basic math to calculate such things as return on investment and cost/benefit analysis.
* Project Management.
* Introduction to computer technology (including operations and networking).
* Principles of software design.
* Principles of data base deign.

Aside from the initial education/training, the "Knowledge" variable requires a program of continuous improvement. This can be done by attending supplemental training, by reading and researching articles and books, and active participation in trade groups, such as the International Institute of Business Analysis (IIBA).

As an aside, the forerunner of the IIBA was the Association for Systems Management (ASM) which went defunct back in the 1990's (another indicator of how BSA almost became extinct).

Certification in a chosen profession is also useful for continuous improvement, but without an industry accepted body of knowledge it is pointless. And being certified does not automatically make you a craftsman, but rather it is indicative of your desire to seek further knowledge and improve yourself.

IMPLEMENTING BSA CRAFTSMANSHIP

In my earlier craftsmanship article, I described how a company should devise a suitable corporate culture to embrace craftsmanship; to summarize:

* EMPOWERMENT OF THE WORKER to make certain decisions regarding development of the work product. This involves less micromanagement and more participation by workers in the planning process. In other words, managing from the "bottom-up" as opposed to "top-down."

* CREATION OF A MORE DISCIPLINED AND ORGANIZED WORK ENVIRONMENT promoting a more professional attitude amongst the workers. This includes a corporate position of zero tolerance in defects and inferior workmanship and the adoption of standard methodologies thereby defining best practices for building/delivering work products.

* PROMOTE A PROGRAM OF CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT to sharpen worker skills.

* ESTABLISHMENT OF THREE CLASSES OF WORKERS to denote the level of expertise, such as "Apprentices" (novices requiring training), "Intermediate" (educated and experienced, but not yet expert), and "Master" (expert craftsman).

* ESTABLISH A LINK BETWEEN WORKERS-PRODUCTS-CUSTOMERS to establish a feedback loop to judge satisfaction with a specific product and to the exact worker(s) who produced it.

This approach to implementation is just as applicable to BSA as it is to any other profession.

CONCLUSION

There are undoubtedly craftsmen in the BSA industry; people whose companies and clients have supreme confidence in their ability and trust their expertise unquestioningly. These are people who should be recognized by the industry in order to become models for others to emulate.

But the biggest problem with craftsmanship in this industry is the lack of uniform standards by which we can teach others in a consistent manner. Without such governing standards, BSA will continue to be viewed more as an art as opposed to a science, and true craftsmanship in this field will not be realized.

If you would like to discuss this with me in more depth, please do not hesitate to send me an e-mail.

NOTES:

Defining Information Requirements
"PRIDE" Special Subject Bulletin No. 4 - Dec 24, 2007

Craftsmanship: Its Cultural and Managerial Implications

Keep the faith!

"MORPHING INTO THE REAL WORLD"

Friends, we have just published a new book entitled, "MORPHING INTO THE REAL WORLD - A Handbook for Entering the Work Force" which is a survival guide for young people as they transition into adult life.

Bonnie Wooding, the President-elect of the Toronto Chapter of the International Association of Administrative Professionals (IAAP) said, "Many of our members are just starting their careers and I will be recommending that they read this book, especially Chapter 3, Professional Development - a primer for business skills and filled with basic common sense advice that is simple, easy to follow and extraordinarily practical; and Chapter 5, Do’s and Don’ts of the Workplace, an excellent resource for those questions you are too embarrassed to ask for fear of looking foolish."

The Miami Hurricane recently reviewed it (10/22/2007) and said,

"the abundance of information the book provides is a good start for anyone about to take the first step into the real world. Though the concept of adulthood may seem intimidating, it's comforting to know that someone has at least written a guidebook for it."

Reviewer Bill Petrey praised it by saying, "Every young person entering the workplace for the first time should be given a copy of this book."

The book includes chapters to describe how a young person should organize themselves, how to adapt to the corporate culture, develop their career, and improve themselves professionally and socially. Basically, its 208 pages of good sound advice to jump start the young person into the work force. Corporate Human Resource departments will also find this book useful for setting new hires on the right track in their career. It not only reinforces the many formal rules as contained in corporate policy manuals, but also includes the subtle unwritten rules we must all observe while working with others. The book lists for $25 and can be ordered online through MBA or your local book store. Complementing the book is a one day seminar of the same name which can be purchased separately for $4,000.00 (U.S.) plus instructor travel expenses. For more information on both the book and the seminar, visit our corporate web site at: http://www.phmainstreet.com/mba/morph.htm
ISBN: 978-0-9786182-5-4

MY "PET PEEVE OF THE WEEK" IS "JUNK FAXES"

Some time ago I discussed the problem of junk mail. This week I would like to discuss Junk Faxes; you know, those irritating ads and offers that propagate on our fax machines. First, I believe fax machines have outlived their usefulness. Rarely do I ever use it, except for those obscure situations when someone needs to send us something. Most of the time I am communicating by e-mail or telephone. But even for a small company like mine I sure get a lot of faxes. This is the main reason I no longer give out our fax number unless somebody positively, absolutely has to send us something. Nonetheless, our fax number inevitably gets on a mailing list and we suddenly get swamped with faxes; seems like a waste of paper to me.

I don't know if you actually look at these junk faxes, normally I don't, except to lookup a number at the bottom of the fax where you can call to be removed from the sender's mailing list. Most of the time its a toll free number, other times its a clever ruse to pay for a phone call. You have to be careful.

I recently investigated this on the Internet and came upon an interesting site called "JunkFaxes.org" which gives some valuable tips on fighting off junk faxes. For example, they list the Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991 ("TCPA"); let me read it to you:

"The TCPA (47 USC § 227), and its implementing FCC regulations ( mainly 47 CFR § 64.1200) prohibits the transmission via facsimile of any material advertising the commercial availability or quality of any product, service or property to any person without that person's prior express permission or request.

Under the (ACT) TCPA, recipients of unsolicited fax advertisements can file suit in state court to collect the greater of $500 or actual damages for each violation, and/or obtain an injunction (a single junk fax can, and often does, contain multiple violations). If a court determines that the violations were willful or knowing, the damages can be tripled at the discretion of the court."

The web site also provides instructions for filing a complaint.

Well this sounds all well and good, but who is really going to take the time to report some trivial faxes? Not many people that I know of; not unless they are being bombarded by faxes every few minutes. Most people just rip them up and throw them away, or call the fax removal numbers at the bottom of the sheet. All the junk faxes do for me is push me a little closer to pulling the plug on the machine altogether. If you really want to get hold of me, there are basically two things you can do: give me a phone call (I am one of the few remaining souls that don't believe in voice mail unless I am truly out of the office), or send me an e-mail with an attachment. Otherwise, forget it.

Such is my Pet Peeve of the Week.

Note: All trademarks both marked and unmarked belong to their respective companies.

"BRYCE'S PET PEEVE OF THE WEEK"

Folks, a couple of years ago I started to include my "Pet Peeve of the Week" in these "Management Visions" podcasts. They have become so popular that I now syndicate them through the Internet and they are available for republication in other media. To this end, I have created a separate web page for my writings which you can find at phmainstreet.com Look for the section, "The Bryce is Right!" Hope you enjoy them.

AND FINALLY...

I received the following e-mails from my "Pet Peeve" entitled, "Naysayers":

A P.J. in Washington wrote...

"Great blog. I agree that sometimes people just have to turn off the outside world or just take what other people say with a grain of salt. Sometimes you have to go out there and do it as they say, whether others think it's a good idea or not.

On the same note though, sometimes there are those who are exactly opposite of naysayers and become just as annoying as the naysayers. Sometimes there comes a point where you know you'll never be Michael Jordan or even Keith Van Horn. And then there are those people who say the sky is the limit yet never really do anything to reach that limit. People who tell their kids that they'll be doctors one day, which is fine, except the kids never study, the kids never do good in school, and the parents just praise them for getting an F and still refuse to acknowledge that sometimes it takes a little hard work and not just positive thinking to do things. They become more "the world is great" theorists who aren't much better than "the world stinks" theorists.

I think thinking objectively is what many people refuse to do these days.. Whether it's the naysayers or the sky is the limit sayers. Just because somebody tells you that it's not worth it or it can't be done, really doesn't mean it can't. But also just because you say the glass if not only half-full, but fulll, doesn't really mean much if you never really work hard to achieve that or you just don't have the ability to achieve it.

Telling someboody they will never be Michael Jordan can push a person toward great things if they believe in themselves and not what others say. But telling somebody they will be Jordan over and over could also push a person into disaster if they keep hearing the praises that are really never warranted."

I received the following e-mails regarding my "Pet Peeve" on "Stess":

A D.A. in Ann Arbor, Michigan wrote...

"I like to remind myself that the only time I won't have stress is when I'm dead. Stress is probably the root cause for our evolution; the only thing going for us is our mental capacity and our reaction to logically think our way out of dangerous situations which is triggered by stressers. Now we have a reserve of that chemistry in our modern world bodies with nothing else to do but worry, feel depressed, or feel anxiety. Our world was completely different even a hundred years ago and we're still playing catch-up."

An A.M. in Frisco, Texas wrote...

"A healthy level of stress can be a good thing but too much can have devastating effects on our mental and physical health. We'd all do well to learn to deal with the stress rather than treat the symptoms. There are so many resources out there to help deal with stress - a good belly laugh is one of them. This treats stress so much more effectively than a pill."

Again, thanks for your comments. For these and other comments, please visit my "Bryce is Right!" web site.

Keep those cards and letters coming.

MBA is an international management consulting firm specializing in Information Resource Management. We offer training, consulting, and writing services in the areas of Enterprise Engineering, Systems Engineering, Data Base Engineering, Project Management, Methodologies and Repositories. For information, call us at 727/786-4567.

Our corporate web page is at:

http://phmainstreet.com/mba/

Management Visions is a presentation of M. Bryce & Associates, a division of M&JB Investment Company of Palm Harbor, Florida, USA. The program is produced on a weekly basis and updated on Sundays. It is available in versions for RealPlayer, Microsoft Media Player, and MP3 suitable for Podcasting. See our web site for details. You'll find our broadcast listed in several Podcast and Internet Search engines, as well as Apples' iTunes.

If you have any questions or would like to be placed on our e-mailing list to receive notification of future broadcasts, please e-mail it to timb001@phmainstreet.com

For a copy of past broadcasts, please contact me directly.

We accept MP3 files with your voice for possible inclusion in the broadcast.

There is no charge for adding a link to "Management Visions" on your web page, for details and HTML code, see the "Management Visions" web site.

Management Visions accepts advertising. For rates, please contact yours truly directly.

Copyright © 2008 by M&JB Investment Company of Palm Harbor, Florida, USA. All rights reserved. "PRIDE" is the registered trademark of M&JB Investment Company.

This is Tim Bryce reporting.

Since 1971: "Software for the finest computer - the Mind."

END

Labels:

Monday, February 18, 2008

February 25, 2008

UNDERSTANDING THE SPECIFICATIONS PUZZLE

"You like potato and I like potahto
You like tomato and I like tomahto
Potato, potahto, Tomato, tomahto."
Let's call the whole thing off."

- Lyrics by Ira Gershwin; Music by George Gershwin

Defining specifications for the design and development of systems and software is a lot like this classic Gershwin song and what I personally regard as the biggest cause of confusion in the Information Technology field for as long as I can remember, which is over 30 years in the industry. Some people say specifications should be based on the inherent properties of information, others believe it is based on a screen/report or file layout, yet others adamantly believe it should be based on process and data specifications. Interestingly, all are absolutely correct. The difference lies in the perspective of the person and the work to be performed. For example, how we define specifications for the design of an automobile is certainly different than how we specify a skyscraper. The same is true in the I.T. field where we have different things to be produced by different people; for example:

1. THE PROGRAMMER (aka, Software Engineer) requires precise specifications in order to develop program code (source and object). This normally takes the form of processing requirements (e.g., hardware configuration, types of transactions to be processed, volume, timing, messages, etc.) and physical data requirements (input/output/file layouts).

2. DBA (Data Base Administrator) requires precise specifications in order to select a suitable file management technique (e.g., DBMS) and produce the necessary Data Definition Language (DDL) for it. This normally takes the form of a logical data base model representing relationships between data entities.

3. THE ANALYST (aka, Systems Analyst, Systems Engineer, Systems Architect, Business Analyst) - requires specifications about the end-User's information requirements in order to design a system solution. This is normally based on a definition of the user's business actions and/or decisions to be supported. Following the system design, the Analyst produces the specifications required by the Programmer and DBA to fulfill their part of the puzzle. From this perspective, the Analyst is the translator between the end-User and the Programmers and DBAs.

Each party has his own unique perspective of the puzzle and, as such, requires different "specifications." To compound the problem though, the role of the Analyst sharply diminished over the years, leaving it to the Programmers to try and determine what the end-User needs, a skill they are typically not trained or suited for. To illustrate, I am reminded of the story of the IT Director at a shoe manufacturing company who received a call from the corporate Sales Manager asking for some help on a pressing problem. The IT Director sent over one of his programmers to meet with the Sales Manager and discuss the problem. Basically, the manager wanted a printout of all shoe sales sorted by model, volume, type, color, etc. The programmer immediately knew how to access the necessary data and sorted it accordingly thereby producing a voluminous printout (three feet high) which he dutifully delivered to the user.

The IT Director stopped by the Sales Manager's office a few days later to inquire if the programmer had adequately serviced the user. The sales manager afforded the programmer accolades on his performance and proudly pointed at the impressively thick printout sitting on his desk. The IT Director then asked how the manager used the printout. He explained he took it home over the weekend, slowly sifted through the data, and built a report from it showing sales trends.

"Did you explain to the programmer you were going to do this?" asked the IT Director.

"No," replied the Sales Manager.

"Aren't you aware we could have produced your report for you and saved you a lot of time and effort?"

"No."

This is a classic example of the blind leading the blind. The user did not know how to adequately describe the business problem, and the programmer asked the wrong questions. Remarkably, both the Sales Manager and programmer were delighted with the results. The IT Director simply shook his head in disbelief.

There are substantial differences between specifying information requirements and specifying software. Both have their place, but both serve different purposes. Whereas a true Analyst investigates the underlying business rationale of the information, the Programmer lives in the physical world and is only concerned with how the software will work.

It is not uncommon to hear programmers lament, "Users do not know what they want." They may not know how it should physically look or how it should best be delivered, but Users most definitely know what they want from an information point of view. Most programmers simply are not asking the right questions. Then again, they were not trained for this and are trying to compensate for the lack of true Analysts.

Remarkably, the Analyst function is experiencing a resurgence in the industry as companies are realizing that a higher level person is needed to understand the business and have a more global perspective of a company's systems and software. To illustrate, the process should fundamentally work like this:

1. Working with the User, the Analyst studies the business and helps the User specify information requirements.

2. From the requirements, the Analyst produces a system design which includes either a new system and/or modification of an existing system. As part of the design, the Analyst defines:

  • The logical processing of data in terms of how it is to be collected, stored, and retrieved.
  • The business processes affected, including the parts implemented by the computer.
  • The design of the inputs and outputs.
  • The design of the logical data base model.

In considering the computer processing, the Analyst determines which portions can be implemented by a commercial package or requires programming.

3. The design specifications are conveyed to the Programmer and the DBA for implementation.

4. From the logical data base model, the DBA designs a physical solution and produces the necessary Data Definition Language. The DBA passes on the physical file layouts to the Programmer for implementation.

5. The Programmer studies the software specifications and determines a suitable method of implementation, e.g., languages to be used, along with suitable tools and techniques for design.

The real beneficiary of such an approach is the programmer as the "guess work" has been eliminated for him. This may be an oversimplification of the overall process, but it is intended to show the vital role the Analyst plays and how it contrasts with the other participants. In the absence of such a person, the Programmer inevitably defaults to the role of Analyst and here is where specification problems begin to emerge.

This also hints at the limitations of "agile" methods. To their credit, the proponents of such methodologies recognize they are limited to software and, in particular, a single program. In doing so, they are trying to expedite the overall process of specification gathering in order to get to the job of programming.

In addition to defining the relationships between the various development functions, there is also the problem of developing a standard and consistent approach for recording specifications. This can be performed orally, but more likely it is recorded using a documentation technique to communicate the work to be performed and as a means to check the finished product to see if it does indeed satisfy the specifications. In the fields of engineering and construction, standards have been developed over the years to record specifications, such as blueprinting. But in the I.T. field, a myriad of techniques have been introduced with little or no standardization. For example, there are several different types of graphical and textural techniques, as well as repositories and data dictionaries to record and track specifications. Regardless, very few companies have adopted standards for recording specifications.

CONCLUSION

The problem with specifications in the design and development of systems and software is primarily due to a lack of standardization in the industry. There are a lack of standards in the areas of:

  • Different types of deliverables resulting from the development process and how to format them (including specifications).

  • Different development functions participating in the process, along with their interrelationships, and duties and responsibilities.

  • Different perspectives of development in terms of the inherent properties of systems and software.

  • Different methods, tools and techniques for performing design and development.

As long as there remains a lack of standardization in the I.T. industry, there will always remain a different interpretation of what specifications are and how to best document them. In other words, we'll go on saying "You like tomato and I like tomahto." So when do we call the whole thing off?

If you would like to discuss this with me in more depth, please do not hesitate to send me an e-mail.

REFERENCES:

Defining Information Requirements
"PRIDE" Special Subject Bulletin No. 4 - Dec 24, 2007
http://www.phmainstreet.com/mba/ss041227.pdf

Understanding Information
"PRIDE" Special Subject Bulletin No. 78 - June 5, 2006
http://www.phmainstreet.com/mba/ss060605.pdf

What is a good program spec?
"PRIDE" Special Subject Bulletin No. 14 - Mar 07, 2005
http://www.phmainstreet.com/mba/ss050307.pdf

The Ratio of Analysts to Programmers
"PRIDE" Special Subject Bulletin No. 85 - July 24, 2006
http://www.phmainstreet.com/mba/ss060724.pdf

Logical vs. Physical Design: Do You Know the Difference?
"PRIDE" Special Subject Bulletin No. 73 - May 1, 2006
http://www.phmainstreet.com/mba/ss060501.pdf

Is Software Hard?
"PRIDE" Special Subject Bulletin No. 8 - Jan 24, 2005
http://www.phmainstreet.com/mba/ss050124.pdf

OUR BRYCE'S LAW OF THE WEEK therefore is...

"Good specifications will always improve programmer productivity far better than any programming tool or technique."

"MORPHING INTO THE REAL WORLD"

Friends, we have just published a new book entitled, "MORPHING INTO THE REAL WORLD - A Handbook for Entering the Work Force" which is a survival guide for young people as they transition into adult life.

Bonnie Wooding, the President-elect of the Toronto Chapter of the International Association of Administrative Professionals (IAAP) said, "Many of our members are just starting their careers and I will be recommending that they read this book, especially Chapter 3, Professional Development - a primer for business skills and filled with basic common sense advice that is simple, easy to follow and extraordinarily practical; and Chapter 5, Do’s and Don’ts of the Workplace, an excellent resource for those questions you are too embarrassed to ask for fear of looking foolish."

The Miami Hurricane recently reviewed it (10/22/2007) and said,

"the abundance of information the book provides is a good start for anyone about to take the first step into the real world. Though the concept of adulthood may seem intimidating, it's comforting to know that someone has at least written a guidebook for it."

Reviewer Bill Petrey praised it by saying, "Every young person entering the workplace for the first time should be given a copy of this book."

The book includes chapters to describe how a young person should organize themselves, how to adapt to the corporate culture, develop their career, and improve themselves professionally and socially. Basically, its 208 pages of good sound advice to jump start the young person into the work force. Corporate Human Resource departments will also find this book useful for setting new hires on the right track in their career. It not only reinforces the many formal rules as contained in corporate policy manuals, but also includes the subtle unwritten rules we must all observe while working with others. The book lists for $25 and can be ordered online through MBA or your local book store. Complementing the book is a one day seminar of the same name which can be purchased separately for $4,000.00 (U.S.) plus instructor travel expenses. For more information on both the book and the seminar, visit our corporate web site at: http://www.phmainstreet.com/mba/morph.htm
ISBN: 978-0-9786182-5-4

MY "PET PEEVE OF THE WEEK" IS "NAYSAYERS"

It is one think to offer wise counsel, it's quite another to try and screw things up for others simply by being negative. I remember when I was a kid, there would be classmates who advised me that I shouldn't take a particular class, that it was too difficult and I would fail. Interestingly, I didn't. I also had friends tell me not to play football; that it would affect my grades and I would injure myself. Again, it didn't; and I found it to be a very rewarding experience.

As I got into the workforce, I found even more naysayers who would tell me, "It cannot be done," or "We've never done it that way before." I've also seen this same phenomenon in several nonprofit organizations I have participated in. If I were to follow the advice of these naysayers, I would probably be still living at home with my parents sleeping in my crib.

Although I listen to the advice of the naysayers, it gets rather old after a while and a bit disconcerting. These are people who honestly believe the glass is half empty all of the time, and get visibly upset when you point out that the glass is actually half full. But their negativity can wear on a person over time. If you tell someone they cannot do something enough times, people start to believe it and act accordingly. Basically, naysayers want us to conform to their way of thinking, but by doing so, they are discouraging original thought and innovation which is a tragedy.

In a way, it reminds me of a chapter from Ayn Rand's acclaimed novel, "The Fountainhead," about a brilliant architect who dares to stand alone against the hostility of unimaginative conformists. In the book, Howard Roark, the protagonist, is brought up on charges of destroying a building he designed. In the courtroom, he offers an eloquent defense which ultimately leads to his vindication. Although space prohibits me from including his complete courtroom testimony here, the following passage sums up the problem with naysayers. In the courtroom, Roark explains to the jury...

"Throughout the centuries there were men who took first steps down new roads armed with nothing but their own vision. Their goals differed, but they all had this in common: that the step was first, the road new, the vision unborrowed, and the response they received--hatred. The great creators--the thinkers, the artists, the scientists, the inventors--stood alone against the men of their time. Every great new thought was opposed. Every great new invention was denounced. The first motor was considered foolish. The airplane was considered impossible. The power loom was considered vicious. Anesthesia was considered sinful. But the men of unborrowed vision went ahead. They fought, they suffered and they paid. But they won."

In a strange way, naysayers are doing us all an important service; for every "problem" they identify, I see an "opportunity." As I learned a long time ago, if I can think a problem through, I can do it.

I have advised my children that throughout life they will undoubtedly meet with naysayers who will take pleasure in chiding them as to what cannot be done. I thereby admonish them to prove them wrong and return the favor.

Such is my Pet Peeve of the Week.

Note: All trademarks both marked and unmarked belong to their respective companies.

"BRYCE'S PET PEEVE OF THE WEEK"

Folks, a couple of years ago I started to include my "Pet Peeve of the Week" in these "Management Visions" podcasts. They have become so popular that I now syndicate them through the Internet and they are available for republication in other media. To this end, I have created a separate web page for my writings which you can find at phmainstreet.com Look for the section, "The Bryce is Right!" Hope you enjoy them.

AND FINALLY...

I received the following e-mails from my "Pet Peeve" entitled, "Generation Gap":

An M.S. in Royal Oak, Michigan wrote...

"Good article. Thanks. Yes, mentoring is making a comeback and it is a great job hunting technique. Find someone who has the job you want and learn from him or her. It is a myth that the older generation is computer illiterate. Actually we are the ones who can afford the latest toys. Thanks again for another thoughtful article."

An E.A. in Midland, Michigan wrote...

"I spent 33 years with Dow Chemical Company. In the late 80's, early 90's the company got on the kick of "team building" which involved many meetings. Bottom line was that for me it was very frustrating since most of the "team" things were stuff I was already doing or was a proponent of and I didn't think I needed more "training". Of course my management didn't think I was "buying into" the line since I resisted what I considered a waste of my time. I later found out that this "team building", which was being pursued throughout industry, was primarily in response to the idea that the younger generation had not learned how to cooperate with others and needed to learn how to work together. If management had left it to some of us experienced people, we would have "taught" them how to cooperate with no meetings in a big hurry (usually only takes one project). Probably would have had some hurt feelings but those fix themselves with success."

I received the following e-mails regarding my "Pet Peeve" on "Chatty Cathies":

An M.B. in Clearwater, Florida wrote:

"I dropped an otherwise nice friend because of this, and would love to e-mail her this column, since she is currently driving a mutual friend crazy, and the mutual friend does not want to drop her. Being quite low on energy already due to my illness, I simply did not have the energy to put up with her constant blather, and felt completely drained after each encounter. I don't think this woman realizes that is why she can't keep friends. My husband's father was also like that, but he was not nice, like most of the Chatty folks in your life, he had Narcissistic Personality Disorder. I suspect many Chatty types do, since complete insensitivity to others is one of the symptoms. They are not interested in what you have to say, since it could not possibly be on the level of their grand and perfect ideas, and besides, you do not really exist as an independent entity; you are just an extension of them. Narcissists are awful people, and very toxic to those around them."

A J.S. in Münster, Germany wrote...

"Somehow this fits perfectly to most of my professors."

Keep those cards and letters coming.

MBA is an international management consulting firm specializing in Information Resource Management. We offer training, consulting, and writing services in the areas of Enterprise Engineering, Systems Engineering, Data Base Engineering, Project Management, Methodologies and Repositories. For information, call us at 727/786-4567.

Our corporate web page is at:

http://phmainstreet.com/mba/

Management Visions is a presentation of M. Bryce & Associates, a division of M&JB Investment Company of Palm Harbor, Florida, USA. The program is produced on a weekly basis and updated on Sundays. It is available in versions for RealPlayer, Microsoft Media Player, and MP3 suitable for Podcasting. See our web site for details. You'll find our broadcast listed in several Podcast and Internet Search engines, as well as Apples' iTunes.

If you have any questions or would like to be placed on our e-mailing list to receive notification of future broadcasts, please e-mail it to timb001@phmainstreet.com

For a copy of past broadcasts, please contact me directly.

We accept MP3 files with your voice for possible inclusion in the broadcast.

There is no charge for adding a link to "Management Visions" on your web page, for details and HTML code, see the "Management Visions" web site.

Management Visions accepts advertising. For rates, please contact yours truly directly.

Copyright © 2008 by M&JB Investment Company of Palm Harbor, Florida, USA. All rights reserved. "PRIDE" is the registered trademark of M&JB Investment Company.

This is Tim Bryce reporting.

Since 1971: "Software for the finest computer - the Mind."

END

Labels:

Tuesday, February 12, 2008

February 18, 2008

SHAPETH UP AND GET THINE ACT TOGETHER
(THE BENEFIT OF A LITTLE ORGANIZATION)

My friends and colleagues often ask me how I am able to produce so much in so little time. Although I am flattered by such compliments, it's really not much of a secret which I attribute to the following areas (in no particular order):

  • A strong sense of organization and prioritization which has been ingrained in me over the years during my professional development. Basically, I had good mentors who taught me what was right and what was wrong, what was important and what was not, and how to best spend my time and how to avoid wasting it. This includes being sensitive to schedules and commitments, particularly those of customers. Call me old-fashioned, but I still believe that a person's word should be his bond. My company has now been in business for 37 years and in all of that time we have never failed to meet a customer commitment. This is something I am particularly proud of.

  • Training and experience. Although I have a college degree, I recognize I am far from being perfect, and smart enough to learn from my mistakes as well as others. I network, I listen, I learn. And I believe we're never too old to learn a new trick. As such, I am a firm believer in continuous improvement and set aside time to stay abreast of industry developments. I guess what I'm saying is that you have to exert yourself and exercise some intellectual curiosity as opposed to sitting like a vegetable and hoping someone will spoonfeed you. They won't.

  • Use of standard and reusable methodologies. I recognize the value of uniformity and standardization in work effort and understand its impact on productivity. I am also not a big believer in reinventing the wheel with each project. If something has been tried and proven, I will use it unabashedly, regardless if it is old or out of fashion. I am more interested in results. This also means I am a student of history in my field and have noted successes as well as failures.

  • Competency in the use of technology. I am sure my early indoctrination in computing has materially assisted me in my work effort over the years. One thing technology taught me in particular was the concept of multitasking; not just what I do on the computer, but also how I work in general. More importantly, I do not fear technology and am always looking for new ways for it to assist me. Make no mistake though, I have been burned on more than one occasion by new technology, particularly in the use of beta-releases. Consequently, I am less likely to migrate to something new until it has proven itself as a viable alternative. In other words, I have to trust the technology before I make it a normal part of my operations.

  • Avoiding complicated solutions. I tend to believe the best solutions are simple ones. Some people have the curious habit of making life more complicated than what is really necessary. As for me, I have always sought pragmatic solutions as opposed to wallowing in technical detail. True, there may be situations where there are many elements to be addressed by a single problem. In this event, controls have to be enacted to manage complexity. But in all my years in this industry, I have never encountered a technical problem that couldn't be conquered with a little imagination, some concentrated effort, and a lot of good old-fashioned management.

  • Caring about what you produce; which I consider to be of paramount importance. If you do not have the determination or dedication to see something through to its successful completion, no amount of technology will expedite the assignment. To me, your work is a reflection of your character and how you will be judged by others. Interestingly, some people do not make this connection and put forth little effort. Caring about your work makes you more resourceful than others as you are concerned with doing whatever is necessary to get the job done. Ultimately, your work is a reflection of your value system which will become obvious to your coworkers and your boss.

Bottom-line, my productivity is based on my sense of organization and discipline I learned at home, in school and in the workplace. Fortunately, I believe I had some very good teachers along the way. The one thing I have learned is that you make money when you are organized and waste money when you aren't.

If you would like to discuss this with me in more depth, please do not hesitate to send me an e-mail.

OUR BRYCE'S LAW OF THE WEEK therefore is...
This week, instead of my usual Bryce's Law, I have a quote from the legendary baseball great Satchel Paige who said, "Don't look back - something might be gaining on you."

"MORPHING INTO THE REAL WORLD"

Friends, we have just published a new book entitled, "MORPHING INTO THE REAL WORLD - A Handbook for Entering the Work Force" which is a survival guide for young people as they transition into adult life.

Bonnie Wooding, the President-elect of the Toronto Chapter of the International Association of Administrative Professionals (IAAP) said, "Many of our members are just starting their careers and I will be recommending that they read this book, especially Chapter 3, Professional Development - a primer for business skills and filled with basic common sense advice that is simple, easy to follow and extraordinarily practical; and Chapter 5, Do’s and Don’ts of the Workplace, an excellent resource for those questions you are too embarrassed to ask for fear of looking foolish."

The Miami Hurricane recently reviewed it (10/22/2007) and said,

"the abundance of information the book provides is a good start for anyone about to take the first step into the real world. Though the concept of adulthood may seem intimidating, it's comforting to know that someone has at least written a guidebook for it."

Reviewer Bill Petrey praised it by saying, "Every young person entering the workplace for the first time should be given a copy of this book."

The book includes chapters to describe how a young person should organize themselves, how to adapt to the corporate culture, develop their career, and improve themselves professionally and socially. Basically, its 208 pages of good sound advice to jump start the young person into the work force. Corporate Human Resource departments will also find this book useful for setting new hires on the right track in their career. It not only reinforces the many formal rules as contained in corporate policy manuals, but also includes the subtle unwritten rules we must all observe while working with others. The book lists for $25 and can be ordered online through MBA or your local book store. Complementing the book is a one day seminar of the same name which can be purchased separately for $4,000.00 (U.S.) plus instructor travel expenses. For more information on both the book and the seminar, visit our corporate web site at: http://www.phmainstreet.com/mba/morph.htm
ISBN: 978-0-9786182-5-4

MY "PET PEEVE OF THE WEEK" IS "GENERATION GAP"

I'm hearing a lot about the generation gap in business; that young people are not working well with their elders, and there may very well be a lot of truth in this. Following World War II, the "Greatest Generation" took over and dominated business like never before. The 50's and 60's were the go-go years that propelled the American economy. During the 1960s' the "Baby Boomers" started to rebel and attacked the taboos of the day. Nonetheless, they eventually acclimated into the corporate cultures and learned from their elders. But a generational split occurred during the 1980's and 90's, and I attribute it to two reasons:

First, when the PC was introduced in the 1980's a new generation of younger workers were introduced to program and maintain them, A split then occurred in the Information Technology field whereby the "old guys" took care of the mainframes and the "young guys" stood in the opposing camp. Both thought they were right and wouldn't cooperate, hence the split. Ironically, both groups were right as we needed both technologies. But management didn't see this and allowed the division to grow and fester. This carried over into other parts of the work force where new attitudes challenged older and more established ones. In other words, technology played a significant role in the split.

Second, during the cost-cutting and downsizing years of the 1980's and 1990's companies abandoned the mentoring system, whereby older employees worked with younger people to teach them the business. Without such mentoring, the younger generation pushed the envelope over how business was conducted. Hence, the rise of individualism and changes in the workplace such as dress and social attitudes.

Interestingly, mentoring is starting to experience a resurgence as companies find it to be an effective approach for developing employees and promoting teamwork. Mentoring is a good approach for helping the younger people make the transition into the corporate culture and ultimately take over the business. It's natural and should be encouraged. Actually, we have had progressive classes of workers for literally thousands of years, e.g.; apprentices, intermediaries, and master craftsmen.

The one good thing resulting from the latest talk of generation gaps in business is that it is forcing companies to rethink social attitudes in the workplace. Such discussion is inevitable as companies have to learn to work as a team as opposed to a group of individuals.

Such is my Pet Peeve of the Week.

Note: All trademarks both marked and unmarked belong to their respective companies.

"BRYCE'S PET PEEVE OF THE WEEK"

Folks, a couple of years ago I started to include my "Pet Peeve of the Week" in these "Management Visions" podcasts. They have become so popular that I now syndicate them through the Internet and they are available for republication in other media. To this end, I have created a separate web page for my writings which you can find at phmainstreet.com Look for the section, "The Bryce is Right!" Hope you enjoy them.

AND FINALLY...

I received the following comment from last week's essay entitled, "Has IBM Become Irrelevant?":

An L.M. in Chapel Hill, North Carolina wrote...

"No company is in charge of its own destiny. You wouldn't like it if they were. We would have even less freedom in the market than we do now."

I received the following e-mails regarding my "Pet Peeve" on "Finding a Good Mechanic":

An M.B. in Clearwater, Florida wrote:

"You're so right, and unscrupulous ones are especially likely to screw over women."

A J.H. in Pensacola, Florida wrote...

"I had this conversation with a colleague just the other day. My beloved mechanic had to shut down his mom and pop garage because he couldn't afford to keep up with all the diagnostic equipment. Now I'm stuck with the dealerships who charge at least $100 to hook up the diagnostic to the car to find that the engine light is on because the guy at the gas station didn't turn the cap three times to keep the air out." :(

An I.L. in Chicago wrote...

"I have a brother thats a mechanic. I get to trade computer work for mechanic work. My extended family is blessed with an abundance of skills."

And I received the following e-mail regarding my "Pet Peeve" on "Recording Your Time":

A J.K. in the United Kingdom wrote...

"Recording time, like you suggest, is a chore. For a creative person it is a chain around the neck and, if you can accept it, we are all creative; some just don't recognize that in themselves. Work should at least be pleasant.

People are not machines, we have need for motivation; the effect of being rewarded for our efforts by getting paid every week gets a bit monotonous. Oh, yes, we can go out and buy the odd car or two, but that sort of materialistic motivator soon wears a bit thin. There has to be an internal motivation, praise, a bonus, an 'employee of the week' reward.

If you are the 'manager' you have to 'manage' the situation, treat this as an opportunity to set new goals, to embrace the problem. To someone like yourself, perhaps the time sheet is a piece of written work which you welcome. For others, it's form filling, bureaucracy, trying to remember where you were, trying to convince yourself you are worth your wages. Yeah, time is money! But trying to remember every time you went to the loo, blew your nose, chatted to that nice lady in sales, grabbed a second coffee, asked Niel in accounts about your expenses......is b o r i n g.

I understand your viewpoint. Try to deal with it another way."

Thanks for your comments. For these and other comments, please visit my "Bryce is Right!" web site.

Keep those cards and letters coming.

MBA is an international management consulting firm specializing in Information Resource Management. We offer training, consulting, and writing services in the areas of Enterprise Engineering, Systems Engineering, Data Base Engineering, Project Management, Methodologies and Repositories. For information, call us at 727/786-4567.

Our corporate web page is at:

http://phmainstreet.com/mba/

Management Visions is a presentation of M. Bryce & Associates, a division of M&JB Investment Company of Palm Harbor, Florida, USA. The program is produced on a weekly basis and updated on Sundays. It is available in versions for RealPlayer, Microsoft Media Player, and MP3 suitable for Podcasting. See our web site for details. You'll find our broadcast listed in several Podcast and Internet Search engines, as well as Apples' iTunes.

If you have any questions or would like to be placed on our e-mailing list to receive notification of future broadcasts, please e-mail it to timb001@phmainstreet.com

For a copy of past broadcasts, please contact me directly.

We accept MP3 files with your voice for possible inclusion in the broadcast.

There is no charge for adding a link to "Management Visions" on your web page, for details and HTML code, see the "Management Visions" web site.

Management Visions accepts advertising. For rates, please contact yours truly directly.

Copyright © 2008 by M&JB Investment Company of Palm Harbor, Florida, USA. All rights reserved. "PRIDE" is the registered trademark of M&JB Investment Company.

This is Tim Bryce reporting.

Since 1971: "Software for the finest computer - the Mind."

END

Labels:

Tuesday, February 05, 2008

February 11, 2008

HAS IBM BECOME IRRELEVANT?

Years ago the technology industry was defined by IBM and the "BUNCH" (Burroughs, Univac, NCR, CDC, and Honeywell). One by one, the BUNCH slowly evaporated and have either been merged into other entities or taken a back seat to others, such as Digital, Wang, Data General, and others, all of which have also ridden off into the sunset. In the software industry, the big guns used to be Cincom, Cullinane, MSA, and Computer Associates, but it is now hard to find anyone in the business who even remembers their names.

Today, Wall Street defines the technology industry by such names as Google, Apple, Cisco, Dell, Microsoft, Priceline, Facebook, Intuit, Yahoo!, and others. Remarkably, IBM's name rarely appears in this regards which leads me to believe they are starting to fade from view as the BUNCH did years earlier.

There was a time when you mentioned the name "IBM" it conjured up images of mainframes, midrange computers, PC's, networks, operating systems, DBMS' and office equipment. Today, I'm not too sure exactly what it represents. I think they still sell "big iron" but they have abdicated just about everything else to others. They talk about such things as middleware, storage devices, and file servers, which is a far cry from the comprehensive product line that once dominated the industry.

For years it was well understood in the corporate world that you could never get fired for recommending the purchase of IBM products. It was the safe bet. Now they are lucky to be even considered in the running. From a hardware point of view, I still believe they know how to engineer products. I still have some of their PC's which, when you look under the cover, are solidly built and much better than just about anyone else's. But IBM now finds itself in the awkward position of having to prove itself as a viable solution provider.

IBM used to be well known for strong marketing tactics, some say heavy handed, but this started to change in the 1990's as IBM acquiesced the desktop to Microsoft. Instead of dominating the industry, they now appear to be content to lay back on the ropes absorbing one punch after another. What bothers me is that they give the appearance of a company who is no longer in charge of their own destiny and rely on others for direction. To me, this is the sign of a company on the verge of becoming irrelevant.

If you would like to discuss this with me in more depth, please do not hesitate to send me an e-mail.

OUR BRYCE'S LAW OF THE WEEK therefore is...
This week, instead of my usual Bryce's Law, I have a quote from the legendary baseball great Satchel Paige who said, "Don't look back - something might be gaining on you."

"MORPHING INTO THE REAL WORLD"

Friends, we have just published a new book entitled, "MORPHING INTO THE REAL WORLD - A Handbook for Entering the Work Force" which is a survival guide for young people as they transition into adult life.

Bonnie Wooding, the President-elect of the Toronto Chapter of the International Association of Administrative Professionals (IAAP) said, "Many of our members are just starting their careers and I will be recommending that they read this book, especially Chapter 3, Professional Development - a primer for business skills and filled with basic common sense advice that is simple, easy to follow and extraordinarily practical; and Chapter 5, Do’s and Don’ts of the Workplace, an excellent resource for those questions you are too embarrassed to ask for fear of looking foolish."

The Miami Hurricane recently reviewed it (10/22/2007) and said,

"the abundance of information the book provides is a good start for anyone about to take the first step into the real world. Though the concept of adulthood may seem intimidating, it's comforting to know that someone has at least written a guidebook for it."

Reviewer Bill Petrey praised it by saying, "Every young person entering the workplace for the first time should be given a copy of this book."

The book includes chapters to describe how a young person should organize themselves, how to adapt to the corporate culture, develop their career, and improve themselves professionally and socially. Basically, its 208 pages of good sound advice to jump start the young person into the work force. Corporate Human Resource departments will also find this book useful for setting new hires on the right track in their career. It not only reinforces the many formal rules as contained in corporate policy manuals, but also includes the subtle unwritten rules we must all observe while working with others. The book lists for $25 and can be ordered online through MBA or your local book store. Complementing the book is a one day seminar of the same name which can be purchased separately for $4,000.00 (U.S.) plus instructor travel expenses. For more information on both the book and the seminar, visit our corporate web site at: http://www.phmainstreet.com/mba/morph.htm
ISBN: 978-0-9786182-5-4

MY "PET PEEVE OF THE WEEK" IS "RECORDING YOUR TIME"

I have been teaching Project Management for a long time now. Actually it's not very complicated as the principles have long been established. Every now and then though a hack comes along with some new harebrained scheme related to Project Management, usually involving some pseudo-intellectual formula for calculating project estimates and schedules. In reality, there is no hocus-pocus in Project Management, the mechanics are relatively simple to perform, but to me, it is the human dynamics involved which makes it most interesting. As I explain it, Project Management is not about filling out forms or technology, it's about getting people to complete project tasks on time and within budget. It's all about people. I don't care if you have the most sophisticated software to assist you, unless you can motivate and instruct people properly, you're not going to be completing any project any time soon.

In the past you have heard me talk about managing from the bottom-up; that it is important to get people to participate in the planning process, thereby stimulating their interest and gaining their commitment to project tasks. As part of this, it is necessary to report on their project activities on a routine basis and update estimates and schedules accordingly. This is normally done by recording your time on a daily basis using either an electronic time screen or paper form (for samples, see:

Time Distribution Worksheet
(second example)

The time report should include places to record time spent on project assignments as well as the time spent on indirect activities such as meetings, reading, personal time, etc. They should then be reviewed and approved by the person's manager to make sure time was reported accurately and to calculate project and departmental time summaries.

Interestingly, I run into people who openly resist reporting their time, particularly those in the Information Technology field such as programmers. At first, I was puzzled by their resistance as I saw this as a rather simple and integral part of managing projects. Over time I discovered that the better people openly welcomed time reporting while others shunned it. Some were rather belligerent and resisted any attempts to report the use of their time. Regardless of how patiently I tried to explain it to them, they simply wanted no part of it. They countered they were "professionals" and as such, it was beneath their dignity to record their time. I explained that other "professionals" such as attorneys, accountants, and contractors kept track of their time; why not them? As I discovered later, the reason for their refusal was they simply didn't want people to know what they were doing and were resisting accountability. I find such thinking as a bit mind boggling. For this kind of person, I found you cannot simply request they fill out a time report, you have to demand it, or even threaten them with their job.

As I said, the better workers have no trouble recording their use of time. In fact, they believe it will show management how industrious they really are. And maybe that's what scares the hell out of those who resist it; that they will be exposed for what they are: labor-fakers.

Such is my Pet Peeve of the Week.

Note: All trademarks both marked and unmarked belong to their respective companies.

"BRYCE'S PET PEEVE OF THE WEEK"

Folks, a couple of years ago I started to include my "Pet Peeve of the Week" in these "Management Visions" podcasts. They have become so popular that I now syndicate them through the Internet and they are available for republication in other media. To this end, I have created a separate web page for my writings which you can find at phmainstreet.com Look for the section, "The Bryce is Right!" Hope you enjoy them.

AND FINALLY...

I received the following e-mails from my "Pet Peeve" on "Symbolism":

An M.T. in St. Louis, MO wrote...

"Well said, Tim! We used to take such pride in our symbols, too...and where has that gone? Thank you for encouraging your teams to say the Pledge of Allegiance. The teams that adamantly opposed really should not be allowed to play. I believe that."

An I.L. in New York wrote...

"I would rather burn politicians than flags but they will put you in prison for that. I find that people that complain about flag burning have a real lack of faith in our country's people and Constitution."

I also received the following e-mails regarding my "Pet Peeve" on "Office Clutter":

An M.B. in Clearwater, Florida wrote:

"Wow, Tim, I'm with you on being very annoyed by the 'look at how important and busy I am as noted by my cluttered desk' types, but as a total neatnik, I've noticed over the years that the cluttered types seem to be unable to organize. My husband is like that, and he honestly can't see HOW to organize things. When we were going to move to Winter Haven last year, the moving van company said they would refuse to move us unless he cleaned up his workshop. I watched him attempt to clean up his workshop every weekend for two months. No real progress was being made at all and he seemed baffled. Finally, I took charge and told him what to do, step by step, and it was done in three hours. It's like a part of his brain is missing. One of my best coworkers on my last job was a real messy type, and was sent to time management seminars because of it. It did not help. I am not sure you can really change your style. Yet, you say you've seen it done, so I wish you would come over here and whip him into shape for me! I often joke that he is the living incarnation of 'Pig Pen' from the Peanuts comic strip. Of course, his comeback is that I have turned into Lucy. Touche!"

An F.D. in Edmonton, Alberta wrote...

"I truly believe that the increasing problem with sloppiness is sloppiness... since the utter disposal of dress codes people have gone down hill in almost every way. Today, slacks (not blue jeans) and an open neck shirt is called business casual?... what is business dress?... No running shoes? You rarely see a man in a shirt and tie with a suit anymore. When is the last time anybody saw a shoe shine stand?... These small businesses went the way of the buggy whip because you don't need to shine sneakers, deck shoes, sandals and those wretched Dawgs! I can't say I have ever seen a woman that looks good in the omnipresent flip-flops (or Dawgs) or men that look anything but stupid in sandals... Good manners doesn't allow for mens' bare feet to show and sandals and socks are for vegetarians and other nerds although closer to good dress codes."

Thanks for your comments. For these and other comments, please visit my "Bryce is Right!" web site.

Keep those cards and letters coming.

MBA is an international management consulting firm specializing in Information Resource Management. We offer training, consulting, and writing services in the areas of Enterprise Engineering, Systems Engineering, Data Base Engineering, Project Management, Methodologies and Repositories. For information, call us at 727/786-4567.

Our corporate web page is at:

http://phmainstreet.com/mba/

Management Visions is a presentation of M. Bryce & Associates, a division of M&JB Investment Company of Palm Harbor, Florida, USA. The program is produced on a weekly basis and updated on Sundays. It is available in versions for RealPlayer, Microsoft Media Player, and MP3 suitable for Podcasting. See our web site for details. You'll find our broadcast listed in several Podcast and Internet Search engines, as well as Apples' iTunes.

If you have any questions or would like to be placed on our e-mailing list to receive notification of future broadcasts, please e-mail it to timb001@phmainstreet.com

For a copy of past broadcasts, please contact me directly.

We accept MP3 files with your voice for possible inclusion in the broadcast.

There is no charge for adding a link to "Management Visions" on your web page, for details and HTML code, see the "Management Visions" web site.

Management Visions accepts advertising. For rates, please contact yours truly directly.

Copyright © 2008 by M&JB Investment Company of Palm Harbor, Florida, USA. All rights reserved. "PRIDE" is the registered trademark of M&JB Investment Company.

This is Tim Bryce reporting.

Since 1971: "Software for the finest computer - the Mind."

END

Labels: